A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in Poor Things (2023) Movie

Penulis

  • Syahrani Sam Universitas Negeri Makassar Penulis
  • Muhammad Hasbi Universitas Negeri Makassar Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v2i2.834

Kata Kunci:

Film Discourse Analysis, Poor Things (2023), Pragmatics, Speech Acts, Yule’s Classification

Abstrak

This study explores the types and functions of speech acts employed by characters in Poor Things (2023), a film rich in philosophical, emotional, and ideological discourse. Drawing upon Yule’s classification of speech acts; declarative, representative, expressive, directive, and commissive, this research applies a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze 242 selected utterances from the movie’s script. The data were collected through careful viewing, transcription, and contextual interpretation of the dialogues. Findings reveal that representative speech acts dominate the film, indicating characters' tendencies to express beliefs and shape perceptions. Expressive and directive acts also occur frequently, reflecting the emotional depth and interpersonal influence present in the narrative. Notably, declarative acts, though rare, serve pivotal roles in reshaping social realities and character relationships. These patterns underscore how speech act theory can illuminate character development and thematic construction in cinematic dialogue. This study contributes to the field of pragmatics and film discourse analysis by demonstrating how language functions not merely as communication, but as a tool of agency, identity formation, and narrative progression in contemporary cinema.

Referensi

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Birner, B. J. (2012). Introduction to pragmatics. John Wiley & Sons.

Cahyani, P., & Hasbi, M. (2024). The Semiotics of Luck: Interpreting Visual Metaphors in the Animated Film. Innovations in Language Education and Literature, 1(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.31605/ilere.v1i1.3894

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Cutting, J., & Fordyce, K. (2020). Pragmatics: a resource book for students. Routledge.

Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell Publishing.

Idris, A., & Hasbi, M. (2024). Analysis of the Main Character Costumes in “Enola Holmes” Movie Using CS Peirce’s Theory. GLENS: Global English Insights Journal, 1(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v1i2.365

Jatmiko, A. jatmiko, Agustina, E., & Zulaikah, Z. (2022). Analysis of Speech Act in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness Movie. ENJEL: English Journal of Education and Literature, 1(02), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.30599/enjel.v1i02.426

Leech, G. (2014). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. Routledge.

Parker, F. (1986). Linguistics for non-linguists. Taylor & Francis.

Ramayanti, D., & Marlina, L. (2018). The analysis of types illocutionary acts in “Tangled” movie. English Language and Literature, 7(1), 27–34.

Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech act theory and pragmatics (Vol. 10). Springer.

Syahrir, M. A., & Hasbi, M. (2024). From Strangers to Sun Bleached Flies: A Speech Act Analysis in Ethel Cain’s Lyrics. Innovations in Language Education and Literature, 1(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.31605/ilere.v1i2.4544

Tutuarima, Z., Nuraeningsih, N., & Rusiana, R. (2018). An Analysis of Speech Act Used in London Has Fallen Movie. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv7i23022

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Diterbitkan

2025-05-28

Citation

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Sam, S., & Hasbi, M. (2025). A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in Poor Things (2023) Movie. GLENS: Global English Insights Journal, 2(2), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v2i2.834

Artikel Serupa

1-10 dari 13

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.