Digital Ethics and Learning Autonomy in Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Mediating Role of Trust in AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61220/s6eema73Keywords:
Artificial intelligence in education, Digital ethics, Digital learning motivation, Learning autonomy, Trust in AIAbstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) has transformed digital learning practices while simultaneously raising critical concerns related to ethics, privacy, and user trust, which increasingly influence students’ ability to develop autonomous learning behaviors in AI-driven environments. This study aims to examine the relationships among Technology Readiness, Digital Learning Motivation, Digital Privacy Awareness, and Digital Ethics on Learning Autonomy, with Trust in AI serving as a mediating variable. A quantitative cross-sectional research design was employed involving 105 undergraduate students from Universitas Negeri Makassar, and data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that the proposed model explains 78.8% of the variance in Trust in AI and 84.3% of the variance in Learning Autonomy. Digital Learning Motivation shows a significant positive effect on Trust in AI and Learning Autonomy, while Digital Ethics also significantly influences both constructs; however, Technology Readiness and Digital Privacy Awareness do not significantly predict Trust in AI. Mediation analysis reveals that Trust in AI partially mediates the relationships between Digital Learning Motivation and Digital Ethics with Learning Autonomy. These findings demonstrate that psychological and ethical factors play a more decisive role than technical readiness in fostering trust and supporting autonomous learning in AIED contexts, highlighting the practical importance of integrating digital ethics education and motivational support into AI-based learning systems. Future research should employ longitudinal designs, broader samples, and additional variables such as AI literacy to further explore learning autonomy in AI-driven education.
Downloads
References
[1] H. Luan et al., “Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Front Psychol, vol. 11, no. 580820, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820.
[2] A. M. Al-Zahrani, “Unveiling the shadows: Beyond the hype of AI in education,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696.
[3] A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B. P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.
[4] F. A. Djakfar Musthafa, “Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Pembelajaran: Fenomena Transformasi Otoritas Pengetahuan di Kalangan Mahasiswa,” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 125–136, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.25217/jcie.v4i1.4386.
[5] R. P. Nugroho, E. Lobo, W. Nggadung, and C. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Efikasi Diri, Optimisme, dan Kompetensi Penggunaan AI pada Kemampuan Pembelajaran Mandiri Siswa Generasi Z,” PETIK : Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, vol. 11, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.31980/petik.v11i1.2170.
[6] L. Kim, R. Jitpakdee, W. Praditsilp, and G. Issayeva, “Does technological innovation matter to smart classroom adoption? Implications of technology readiness and ease of use,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100448.
[7] T. Nazaretsky, P. Mejia-Domenzain, V. Swamy, J. Frej, and T. Käser, “The critical role of trust in adopting AI-powered educational technology for learning: An instrument for measuring student perceptions,” Computers Education Artif. Intell., vol. 8, no. 100368, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100368.
[8] A. Mouta, A. M. Pinto-Llorente, and E. M. Torrecilla-Sánchez, “Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Int J Artif Intell Educ, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1166–1205, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9.
[9] I. A. Batubara, W. Wariyati, and Y. D. Prawiyata, “Exploring University Students’ Perceptions of AI: Insights from Indonesia,” Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. 4, no. 03, pp. 1687–1701, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.5465.
[10] S. Mumtaz, J. Carmichael, M. Weiss, and A. Nimon-Peters, “Ethical use of artificial intelligence-based tools in higher education: are future business leaders ready?,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr), vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 7293–7319, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13099-8.
[11] M. I. Syahroni, “Prosedur Penelitian Kuantitati,” Jurnal Al-Musthafa STIT Al-Aziziyah Lombok Barat, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.62552/ejam.v2i3.50.
[12] Q. Qin and S. Zhang, “Visualizing the knowledge mapping of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 449–483, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13076-1.
[13] A. Sriyanta, “Kemajuan Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Mengubah Paradigma Pendidikan,” Jurnal Tahsinia, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 312–325, 2023, doi: 10.57171/jt.v4i2.205.
[14] R. N. Laili, W. A. Wirawati, and M. Nashir, “Student’s Perception on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in English Language Learning: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education,” Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. 4, no. 03, pp. 1389–1403, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.5272.
[15] V. Renjith, R. Yesodharan, J. A. Noronha, E. Ladd, and A. George, “Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research,” Int J Prev Med, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19.
[16] A. T. Jebb, V. Ng, and L. Tay, “A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019,” Front Psychol, vol. 12, no. 63754, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547.
[17] O. S. Falebita and P. J. Kok, “Artificial Intelligence Tools Usage: A Structural Equation Modeling of Undergraduates’ Technological Readiness, Self-Efficacy and Attitudes,” J STEM Educ Res, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 257–282, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1.
[18] M. Fteiha, M. Al-Rashaida, and M. Ghazal, “General and special education teachers’ readiness for artificial intelligence in classrooms: A structural equation modeling study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices in select UAE public and private schools,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 9 September, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331941.
[19] J. Li, R. B. King, C. S. Chai, X. Zhai, and V. W. Y. Lee, “The AI Motivation Scale (AIMS): a self-determination theory perspective,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, pp. 1–22, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2025.2478424.
[20] C. Flerlage, A. Bernholt, and I. Parchmann, “Motivation to use digital educational content - Differences between science and other STEM students in higher education,” Chemistry Teacher International, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 213–228, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1515/cti-2022-0035.
[21] A. Alammary, M. Alshaikh, and A. R. Pratama, “Awareness of security and privacy settings in video conferencing apps among faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PeerJ Comput Sci, vol. 8, 2022, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1021.
[22] S. B. Mariam and M. S. Olawale, “Cyber-Security Awareness And Practices Among Undergraduate Students: A Study On Artificial Intelligence, Privacy Concern, And Data Protection,” 1, Jun. 2024. doi: https://ijitie.aitie.org.ng/index.php/ijitie/article/view/305.
[23] U. Rusmawan, P. Dwi, A. Pamungkas, H. E. Indrawan, and K. Hati, “Menghadapi Isu Etika Dalam Media Digital Melalui Peningkatan Digital Ethics,” 31 KOMATIKA, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2024, doi: 10.34148/komatika/v4i1.797.
[24] L. Weidener and M. Fischer, “Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects,” JMIR Med Educ, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.2196/51247.
[25] K. O. Ampong, B. Acheampong, M. Oliver Kevor, and F. A. Sarfo, “Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) in Education: Trust, Innovativeness and Psychological Need of Students,” Information and Knowledge Management, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 12, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.7176/ikm/13-4-03.
[26] H. T. Tin, “The Using A.I Tools On Fourth-Year Efl Learner-Autonomy: A Case At Nguyen Tat Thanh University,” Global Journal of Arts Humanity and Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–59, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14709765.
[27] P. G. Subhaktiyasa, S. A. K. Candrawati, N. P. Sumaryani, N. W. Sunita, and A. Syakur, “Penerapan Statistik Deskriptif: Perspektif Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif,” Emasains : Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 96–104, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.59672/emasains.v14i1.4450.
[28] M. ŞAHİN and E. AYBEK, “Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 670–692, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.21449/ijate.661803.
[29] C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, R. Mitchell, and S. P. Gudergan, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1617–1643, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655.
[30] F. Fitriani and B. D. Arfini, “Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence (AI) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Mahasiswa,” Transformasi : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Non Formal Informal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 141–149, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33394/jtni.v11i1.16739.
[31] A. A. Agustian and A. Bisri, “Data Mining Optimization Using Sample Bootstrapping and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Credit Approval Classification,” Indonesian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.24014/ijaidm.v2i1.6299.
[32] P. R. Susanthi, D. A. Perdana, and Hazriyanto, H. Kremer, M. Julianti, and Pauzi, “Analysis of the Inner and Outer Models of Job Satisfaction on Performance,” Insticc, May 2024, pp. 147–152. doi: 10.5220/0012649300003798.
[33] N. Rosana, S. Rifandi, A. Muminin, and S. Sumantri, “Inner Model of PLS-SEM on Policy Making about Sound Wave Attractor for Fishery Sustainability,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1473, no. 1, p. 012034, 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1473/1/012034.
[34] M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, M. Pick, B. D. Liengaard, L. Radomir, and C. M. Ringle, “Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade,” Psychol Mark, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1035–1064, May 2022, doi: 10.1002/mar.21640.
[35] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Jan. 14, 2019, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
[36] M. Campbell, A. Barthwal, S. Joshi, A. Shouli, and A. K. Shrestha, “Investigation of the Privacy Concerns in AI Systems for Young Digital Citizens: A Comparative Stakeholder Analysis,” 2025. doi: 10.1109/CCWC62904.2025.10903925.
[37] A. Zarifis, P. Kawalek, and A. Azadegan, “Evaluating If Trust and Personal Information Privacy Concerns Are Barriers to Using Health Insurance That Explicitly Utilizes AI,” Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 66–83, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15332861.2020.1832817.
[38] D. Ramdhani and H. Hakiman, “From digital learning to artificial intelligence: Enhancing autonomy among students of Islamic education,” Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 319–334, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.22515/jemin.v5i2.10221.
[39] A. R. M. Zaki and I. A. Ulya, “Analisis Kesiapan Pedagogis Dan Teknologis Guru Dalam Mengadopsi Ai Sebagai Sarana Pembelajaran Adaptif,” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 7, Jul. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i7.8434.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nabilah Rahman, Elsa Natasya, Andi Dio Nurul Awalia, Muh. Yusril Anam, Della Fadhilatunisa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Email : voice@lontaradigitech.com
