Tantangan dan Solusi Guru dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika di SMP untuk Mengukur Penilaian Autentik di Tengah Tekanan Waktu: Sebuah Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61220/Keywords:
Authentic Assessment, Mathematics Education, Junior High School, Teacher ChallengesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the challenges and solutions faced by teachers in implementing authentic assessment in junior high school mathematics learning amidst time constraints, administrative burdens, and curriculum demands. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, 12 studies published between 2020 and 2025 were analyzed, consisting of eight studies in Indonesia and four studies in Southeast Asia and internationally. The study results indicate that the implementation of authentic assessment is hampered by teachers' low skills in designing valid rubrics, excessive administrative burdens, and pressure to achieve curriculum targets, which makes teachers tend to revert to using conventional tests. However, the literature also highlights several solutions, including the use of digital technologies such as Learning Management Systems (LMS) and rubric generators, ongoing teacher training and workshops, and collaboration through peer assessment to streamline the evaluation process. This study recommends that schools and policymakers reduce non-teaching administrative burdens, provide regular professional training, and develop practical and flexible assessment guidelines to support the sustainable and effective implementation of authentic assessment in mathematics learning.
Downloads
References
[1] D. A. Agustina, Pengembangan instrumen penilaian autentik pada soal cerita matematika di SMP IT Insan Mulia Batanghari, Disertasi, IAIN Metro, 2022.
[2] T. A. Arigiyati, “Implementasi penilaian autentik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 129–142, 2015.
[3] I. D. Beatty et al., “Teacher learning of technology-enhanced formative assessment,” 2008.
[4] E. Ernawati, A. Ghani, R. Trisnawati, and A. Malik, “Teacher’s understanding of minimum competence assessment and its impact on assessment conducted in class,” Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2023.
[5] N. Hidayah, M. N. Wangid, and W. Wuryandani, “Elementary school teacher perception of curriculum changes in Indonesia,” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 77–88, 2022.
[6] I. Imamuddin, “Pelaksanaan penilaian autentik di madrasah (Studi pada guru matematika MTsN 2 Bukittinggi),” Re-JIEM, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022.
[7] I. Junaedi and M. Asikin, “Model INNOMATTS untuk meningkatkan keterampilan guru matematika SMP dalam menerapkan pendekatan saintifik dan penilaian autentik,” Rekayasa: Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi dan Pembelajaran, vol. 13, no. 2, 2015.
[8] B. Kartowagiran and A. Jaedun, “Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2016.
[9] A. Mega and M. Madani, “Analisis asesmen autentik pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 778–788, 2023.
[10] A. Mubarokah and M. Masrukan, “Analisis asesmen autentik dan pembelajaran matematika materi Teorema Pythagoras kelas VIII MTs Negeri di Kabupaten Ngawi,” PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, vol. 4, pp. 80–86, 2021.
[11] M. Muhdar, “Pengaruh PBL dan penilaian berorientasi HOTS terhadap hasil belajar bilangan bulat,” Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika (JIMAT), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 175–183, 2025.
[12] B. Nona, K. Ashford-Rowe, and H. Huijser, “Authentic assessment: Opportunities and challenges,” in Research Handbook on Innovations in Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education, Routledge, 2024, pp. xx–xx.
[13] N. Otero, S. Druga, and A. Lan, “A benchmark for math misconceptions: Bridging gaps in middle school algebra with AI-supported instruction,” pp. 1–37, 2024.
[14] J. A. Phillips, M. C. McElwain, and K. W. Clemmer, “Metacognitive training in professional development can improve and sustain student achievement,” 2016.
[15] A. Ramdan, “Antara kertas dan realita: Penilaian autentik dalam Kurikulum Merdeka,” Jurnal Inovasi Pedagogik dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 56–65, 2025.
[16] N. Saputri, Pengembangan authentic assessment ranah psikomotor dalam pokok bahasan segitiga di SMPN 4 Pitumpanua Kabupaten Wajo, Disertasi, IAIN Palopo, 2022.
[17] Y. Song, J. Kim, Z. Liu, C. Li, and W. Xing, “Students’ perceived roles, opportunities, and challenges of a generative AI-powered teachable agent: a case of middle school math class,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, pp. 1–19, 2024.
[18] S. Syaifuddin, “Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1491–1502, 2020.
[19] C. Tan and C. Lee, “Authentic assessment in lower secondary mathematics: Teachers’ struggles,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.
[20] A. Tenriawaru, “Pengembangan alat penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran geometri di kelas VIII SMP Negeri Sungguminasa Kabupaten Gowa,” EQUALS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.
[21] I. Widaningsih, A. Mulyani, and A. Surahman, “Implementasi penilaian autentik dalam pembelajaran etnomatematika untuk pendidikan inklusif yang berbudaya,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika SANTIKA, vol. 3, pp. 196–214, 2023.
Email : ljmsa@lontaradigitech.com
