Critical Path Identification and Time Estimation in Construction: Application of PDM and PERT

Identifikasi Jalur Kritis dan Estimasi Waktu dalam Konstruksi: Penerapan PDM dan PERT

Authors

  • Gufran Darma Dirawan Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Firnawati Firnawati Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Umara Hasmarani Risqiayah Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Ulfaizahsyahrir Nurfadhila Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Dwi Wahyuni Aprianty Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Noor Fadhilla Ramadhani Universitas Negeri Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61220/jsipakatau.v1i6.2437

Keywords:

Project Scheduling, Microsoft Project, Critical path, Risk Management

Abstract

This study discusses the importance of scheduling in construction projects, particularly the application of the Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) to enhance time efficiency and identify critical activities. Project scheduling is a key element that ensures the project progresses according to plan and is completed on time. PDM serves to illustrate the sequence and interrelationships between activities through node representation, allowing the identification of the critical path. Meanwhile, PERT uses a probabilistic approach with three time estimates to anticipate variations and uncertainties in activity durations. A case study of a health center construction project in Banteang Regency demonstrates that the application of PDM and PERT, compared to the S-curve method, can optimize resource allocation, minimize the risk of delays, and ensure scheduling efficiency. With the support of software like Microsoft Project, the implementation of these two methods is expected to improve project control and ensure timely completion.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini membahas pentingnya penjadwalan dalam proyek konstruksi, khususnya penerapan metode Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) dan Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) untuk meningkatkan efisiensi waktu dan identifikasi kegiatan kritis. Penjadwalan proyek merupakan elemen kunci yang memastikan proyek berjalan sesuai rencana dan selesai tepat waktu. PDM berfungsi untuk menggambarkan urutan dan keterkaitan antar kegiatan melalui representasi node, sehingga memungkinkan identifikasi jalur kritis. Sementara itu, PERT menggunakan pendekatan probabilistik dengan tiga estimasi waktu untuk mengantisipasi variasi dan ketidakpastian dalam durasi kegiatan. Studi kasus pembangunan puskesmas di Kabupaten Banteang menunjukkan bahwa penerapan metode PDM dan PERT, dibandingkan dengan metode kurva-S, dapat mengoptimalkan alokasi sumber daya, meminimalisir risiko penundaan, dan memastikan efisiensi penjadwalan. Dengan dukungan software seperti Microsoft Project, penerapan kedua metode ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan pengendalian proyek dan memastikan penyelesaian yang tepat waktu.

References

Cook, D. L. (1966). Program evaluation and review technique: Applications in education (Issue 17). US Department of health, education, and welfare, Office of education.

Cottrell, W. D. (1999). Simplified program evaluation and review technique (PERT). Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(1), 16–22.

Cynthia, O. U. (2020). Implementation of Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM): A Comparative Study. International Journal of Industrial and Operations Research, 3(004).

Deepika, S., Gomathi, S., Maheswaran, S., Indhumathi, N., Murugesan, G., & Duraisamy, P. (2024). A Comparative Analysis for Optimal Project Completion Utilizing Critical Path Method and Precedence Diagram Method for Efficient Solar Power Plant Installation. In 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.

Ervianto, W. I. (2005). Construction Project Management. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.

Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.

Huynh, Q.-T., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2020). Probabilistic method for managing common risks in software project scheduling based on program evaluation review technique. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), 11(3), 77–94.

Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to.

Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: Case studies. John Wiley & Sons.

Kerzner, H., & Saladis, F. P. (2011). What executives need to know about project management. John Wiley & Sons.

Kreis, D., Gibson, B., Jasper, J., Dyke, C. V., Wallace, C., Catchings, R., & McCormack, S. (2019). Critical Path for Project Development (No. KTC-19-22/SPR17-547-1F). University of Kentucky Transportation Center.

Mittal, R., Lam, V. T., Dukkipati, N., Blem, E., Wassel, H., Ghobadi, M., ... & Zats, D. (2015). TIMELY: RTT-based congestion control for the datacenter. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 45(4), 537-550.

Soeharto, I. (1999). Manajemen Proyek Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Sutrisno, S., Ahmadi, A., & Suharyo, O. S. (2018). The optimization of multipurpose building development on project scheduling using precedence diagram method (PDM). Journal Asro, 9(1), 1–7.

Wahyudiono, S., Andardi, F. R., Rusdianto, Y., & Awalludiensyah, R. (2023). Penerapan Metode Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Pada Proyek Malang Creative Center (MCC) Berdasarkan Building Information Modelling (BIM). Media Teknik Sipil, 21(2), 66-76.

Wiest, J. D. (1981). Precedence diagramming method: Some unusual characteristics and their implications for project managers. Journal of Operations Management, 1(3), 121–130.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-24